If a CEO causes their company to be boycotted, should they be fired?

If a CEO took the job for purposes of political activism, did they apply and interview under false pretenses?

If a ceo uses the company to enact radical woke policies that are opposed by 75% of America, hAVE they VIOLATED their fiduciary responsibility?

If a CEO spends so much time on SOCIAL ENGINEERING CAMPAIGNS that THEIR LATEST product getS recalled in a disastrous launch, ARE THEY A FAILURE?

If a CEO publicly refers to himself as being like America’s enemy the taliban, should such A DECLARATION BE considerED GROSSLY IMPROPER CONDUCT?

If a CEO destroys the century old perception of their company as being a masculine brand, and makes it femininized, is that corporate sabotage?

If a CEO emulates a boycotted beer brand, which lost $28 billion for promoting transgenderism, does that show a severe lack of judgment?

If a ceo requires only white employees to attend racially-themed training, has he racially discriminated and violated the civil rights act of 1964?

If a CEO’s actions make way for class action lawsuits from employees, has he become a legal liability and a threat to the company’s existence?

Does a CEO who seeks to “take on” capitalism have any place in business?

Is it literally impossible for a ceo to get fired at Harley-Davidson when the board of directors is made up of zealots who are as rabidly woke as he is?

get a clue, herr zeitz:

THE TALIBAN IS OUR

ENEMY

Could Jochen Zeitz have said anything more ignorant, hurtful and insensitive than to compare himself favorably with The Taliban? Because The Taliban murdered 2,000 American soldiers, and seriously injured 20,000 more.

Yet Jochen Zeitz apparently thinks it’s cute to refer to himself as “The Taliban of Sustainability”.

OK, well, since you like associating yourself with the name of one of America’s most despised wartime enemies, then how would you like it if we start referring to you as ”The Adolph Hitler of Sustainability”?

After all, both Hitler and The Taliban are enemies who shot and killed our men in uniform. And since you’re German and not from the Middle East, wouldn’t that be a more apt cultural comparison for you? Isn’t it far more likely that you’re related to Adolph Hitler than to any leaders of The Taliban?

Would you taunt the people of Ukraine by calling yourself “The Vladimir Putin of Sustainability”? If not, then why come to America and disrespect us? Because we remember seeing our soldiers killed by The Taliban coming home in body bags.

Harley-Davidson needs to apologize to the families of those who were killed by The Taliban, because this is absolutely inexcusable, and horrifically insensitive, coming from their CEO.

There was a time when Harley-Davidson stood for

manliness and rugged individuality.

Those days are long gone.

BECAUSE OF JOCHEN ZEITZ, IN THE MINDS OF MANY BIKERS, HARLEY DAVIDSON WILL NOW FOREVER BE ASSOCIATED WITH CONFORMITY, FEMININITY, WOKENESS, HOMOSEXUALITY, TRANSGENDERISM, CLIMATE ACTIVISM, CHILD GENITAL MUTILATION, DRAG QUEENS, PRIDE FLAGS, RAGE ROOMS, DADDY ISSUES, AND BEING LECTURED TO ABOUT WHITE PRIVILEGE.

The brand is now dead. This once proud American icon was killed by an obsessive German on a mission to destroy Capitalism as we know it, and to brainwash Americans into the Cult of Wokeness.

JOCHEN ZEITZ IS TO HARLEY-DAVIDSON WHAT

DYLAN MULVANEY IS TO BUD LIGHT:

A DESTROYER.

Jochen Zeitz destroyed Harley-Davidson’s masculine brand using WOKEness every bit as well as Bud Light ruined theirs by using the image of a feminine girly-boy in a bubble bath to sell beer to Cowboys, Bikers, Truckers and Frat Boys.

AND THE DAMAGE IS NOW

PERMANENT.

THE ONLY WAY WE WILL BELIEVE

HARLEY-DAVIDSON HAS CHANGED

IS IF You FIRE THE CEO

AND REPLACE THE BOARD MEMBERS.

GIVE ESTABLISHED

CONSERVATIVES

A SEAT ON YOUR BOARD.

APOLOGIZE FOR BEING WOKE

AND PUBLICLY RENOUNCE

ALL OF YOUR WOKE PRACTICES.

STOP FUNDING WOKE EVENTS

AND INSTITUTIONS.

refuse to fund any THAT TARGET CHILDREN

TO SEXUALIZE

THEM AND MUTILATE THEIR BODIES.

OFFER COMPLETE

TRANSPARENCY

ABOUT INTERNAL COMPANY PRACTICES.